Forgotten your password? 

20 June 2013
The challenges of Research Uptake Part III: Institutional barriers Print
Thursday, 29 November 2012 00:00

This is the third in a four-part blog series on the challenges faced by practitioners of Research Uptake. In Part I we explored the concept of Research Uptake and in Part II, we explored challenges that exist in the field at systemic level. In this third blog, we examine institutional barriers to Research Uptake.

 

 


Institutional barriers to Research Uptake

Focusing now mainly on the supply side of research at an organisational level, given all the systemic challenges, one of the biggest barriers to research uptake is figuring out where to start and how to institutionalise appropriate systems and processes that support research uptake activities. Does a research institute need a central communications/ marketing/ dissemination/ media relations/ knowledge management team? If so, where should it sit? In a grant management office? By itself? As part of the IT department? In the library?

On top of that, where are the capacities for research uptake best placed? Certain skills probably need to remain with individual researchers, but some are probably better supported by an outside team.

Funding research activities is also usually a challenge. It depends on the funding models employed by an individual institute, but many (maybe even most, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa) institutes lack core funding, and must raise money through projects or other sources. Striking a balance between support to projects versus strengthening and supporting institutional engagement is key, and is also hugely difficult. Does a central team get funded out of overheads? Do they try to support themselves through their own projects and research?

And from an institutional perspective, brain drain is always a worry. If organisations invest in building research uptake skills, there’s no guarantee staff will stick around and that they will continue to benefit from these skills. Researchers may end up in a relevant ministry, for example (though this could turn out to be a good thing for the institution). More centralised teams with specific transferable skills often find themselves poached by the private sector, and in developing countries, especially, by international agencies and non-governmental organisations.

Jeff Knezovich is the Policy Influence and Research Uptake Manager for the Future Health Systems Research Consortium based at the Institute of Development Studies in the UK.

...Back

Comments


David Phipps said on 2012-11-29 15:23:15:
I think the point about brain drain is relevant but not unique to research uptake management (=knowledge mobilization in my context). Universities risk losing (and gaining) brains from all support roles. The question about should a university have a central office conflates communications/dissemination with the broader roles of knowledge exchange/research uptake management. There was recently a couple of DRUSSA posts about unviersity communications and I believe they are important allies but shouldn`t be relied on to be replacements for research uptake management. I strgonly believe there is a role for professional research uptake management in the university. In Canada I see these sitting under the research services office, in pan-unviersity research units and in technology transfer (similar to extension) offices. It depends on many local factors most importantly the presence of a local champion willing to take on these emerging institutional roles. The biggest institutional barrier we face in Canada is a more challenging fiscal environment. All unviersities are facing increasing budget pressures and it is difficult to create new units. It is possible to add new roles onto existing staff resources but those are already stretched thin and we risk doing a poor job. Poor performance driven by fiscal restraint is a big institutional barrier in Canada.
Domina Asingizwe said on 2012-12-03 14:01:21:
A research unit really needs a central communications/marketing/dissemination/media relations/knowledge management team and it usually sits under research directorate or attached to dissemination & technology transfer unit if any within the institution. A major challenge is that the work that researchers conduct often does not reach policymakers because of inadequate and inappropriate central communication and limitation of funds. Although we expect that some individuals have much more developed knowledge in research than others as reflected in the variations of peoples’ interest, it is also expected that everybody gains knowledge once it is shared and also through dissemination the users benefit more from the findings. Sometimes, after completion of research project it is hard to disseminate the results to the users because of inadequate/limited funds and it is usually not even budgeted for.
Olumuyiwa Desmennu said on 2013-01-04 15:29:56:
Thanks Jeff for this post. Problems and challenges are well enumerated, but I believe central communications/ marketing/ dissemination/ media relations/ knowledge management team is needed but in the event of fiscal constraints, the pan-unviersity research units /technology transfer (similar to extension) offices /Grant Management Office could be saddled with the responsibility as is done here in Nigeria till the dividends are seen and the unit can be institutionalised. The Challenge of brain drain should not hinder capacity development but should rather encourage it. Centralised funding will also assures the sustainability of such unit as projects have timelines and continuous funding is not assured.